<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thwirl versus TweetDeck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/</link>
	<description>Helping Moms Earn Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cassie</title>
		<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/comment-page-1/#comment-7858</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamasontheweb.com/?p=146#comment-7858</guid>
		<description>Yep, I noticed I wasn't getting all my replies either in Twitter but they were coming through on Twhirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I noticed I wasn&#8217;t getting all my replies either in Twitter but they were coming through on Twhirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elle</title>
		<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/comment-page-1/#comment-7857</link>
		<dc:creator>elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamasontheweb.com/?p=146#comment-7857</guid>
		<description>Actually its funny... I used to use twirl a lot, and then for some reason stopped. I had a friend finally tell me that I was probably not getting all the replies because I was NOT using twirl... come to find out- she was right!!! I will most definately stick with twirl from now on!!! Funny that its more reliable than Twitter itself!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually its funny&#8230; I used to use twirl a lot, and then for some reason stopped. I had a friend finally tell me that I was probably not getting all the replies because I was NOT using twirl&#8230; come to find out- she was right!!! I will most definately stick with twirl from now on!!! Funny that its more reliable than Twitter itself!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nez</title>
		<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/comment-page-1/#comment-7761</link>
		<dc:creator>Nez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamasontheweb.com/?p=146#comment-7761</guid>
		<description>The big kicker for me was the fact that Twhirl also supports Friend Feed. Tracking both services in one app saves time and really helps you keep on top of things. If Friend Feed isn't your bag (though it should be), you could also try another AIR client for Twitter called Spaz. Has some great features but is still a beta.

Cheers,
Nez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big kicker for me was the fact that Twhirl also supports Friend Feed. Tracking both services in one app saves time and really helps you keep on top of things. If Friend Feed isn&#8217;t your bag (though it should be), you could also try another AIR client for Twitter called Spaz. Has some great features but is still a beta.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie</title>
		<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/comment-page-1/#comment-7699</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamasontheweb.com/?p=146#comment-7699</guid>
		<description>Yep, Twhirl was pretty quirky for me as well although I noticed that every time Thwirl wasn't working, either was TweetDeck. With TweetDeck however, you can still post while Twitter is down, then it just tweets it for you once it's back up. I think anyway. Even so, I still prefer Thwirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Twhirl was pretty quirky for me as well although I noticed that every time Thwirl wasn&#8217;t working, either was TweetDeck. With TweetDeck however, you can still post while Twitter is down, then it just tweets it for you once it&#8217;s back up. I think anyway. Even so, I still prefer Thwirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tishia Lee</title>
		<link>http://mamasontheweb.com/2008/07/11/thwirl-versus-tweetdeck/comment-page-1/#comment-7698</link>
		<dc:creator>Tishia Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamasontheweb.com/?p=146#comment-7698</guid>
		<description>I've never even heard of tweet deck until I just read this. I've been using Twhirl for awhile now and I like it but it seems like there had been lots of little quirks with it. It was always down for me but I haven't had any issues lately (knock on wood!!!!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never even heard of tweet deck until I just read this. I&#8217;ve been using Twhirl for awhile now and I like it but it seems like there had been lots of little quirks with it. It was always down for me but I haven&#8217;t had any issues lately (knock on wood!!!!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
